Calendrier

Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
    01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Programme de la semaine


Liste des séminaires

Les séminaires mentionnés ici sont ouverts principalement aux chercheurs et doctorants et sont consacrés à des présentations de recherches récentes. Les enseignements, séminaires et groupes de travail spécialisés offerts dans le cadre des programmes de master sont décrits dans la rubrique formation.

Les séminaires d'économie

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Atelier Histoire Economique

Behavior seminar

Behavior Working Group

brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Development Economics Seminar

Economic History Seminar

Economics and Complexity Lunch Seminar

Economie industrielle

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Football et sciences sociales : les footballeurs entre institutions et marchés

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Industrial Organization

Job Market Seminar

Macro Retreat

Macro Workshop

Macroeconomics Seminar

NGOs, Development and Globalization

Paris Game Theory Seminar

Paris Migration Seminar

Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics

Paris Trade Seminar

PEPES (Paris Empirical Political Economics) Working Group

PhD Conferences

Propagation Mechanisms

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Regional and urban economics seminar

Régulation et Environnement

RISK Working Group

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Séminaire d'Economie et Psychologie

The Construction of Economic History Working Group

Theory Working Group

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Travail et économie publique externe

WIP (Work in progress) Working Group

Les séminaires de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Casse-croûte socio

Déviances et contrôle social : Approche interdisciplinaire des déviances et des institutions pénales

Dispositifs éducatifs, socialisation, inégalités

La discipline au travail. Qu’est-ce que le salariat ?

Méthodes quantitatives en sociologie

Modélisation et méthodes statistiques en sciences sociales

Objectiver la souffrance

Sciences sociales et immigration

Archives d'économie

Accumulation, régulation, croissance et crise

Commerce international appliqué

Conférences PSE

Economie du travail et inégalités

Economie industrielle

Economie monétaire internationale

Economie publique et protection sociale

Groupe de modélisation en macroéconomie

Groupe de travail : Economie du travail et inégalités

Groupe de travail : Macroeconomic Tea Break

Groupe de travail : Risques

Health Economics Working Group

Journée de la Fédération Paris-Jourdan

Lunch séminaire Droit et Economie

Marché du travail et inégalités

Risques et protection sociale

Séminaire de Recrutement de Professeur Assistant

Seminaire de recrutement sénior

SemINRAire

Archives de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Conférence du Centre de Théorie et d'Analyse du Droit

Espace social des inégalités contemporaines. La constitution de l'entre-soi

Etudes halbwachsiennes

Familles, patrimoines, mobilités

Frontières de l'anthropologie

L'auto-fabrication des sociétés : population, politiques sociales, santé

La Guerre des Sciences Sociales

Population et histoire politique au XXe siècle

Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire du politique

Pratiques quantitatives de la sociologie

Repenser la solidarité au 21e siècle

Séminaire de l'équipe ETT du CMH

Séminaire ethnographie urbaine

Sociologie économique

Terrains et religion


Calendrier du 09 juin 2022

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Du 09/06/2022 de 12:30 à 13:30

Salle R1.14, Campus Jourdan 75014 Paris

LOJKINE Ulysse (PSE, Université de Nanterre)

A general power index





I propose a general power index in games. The power of an agent over an outcome is understood as the equilibrium effect on the outcome of variations in the agent’s preferences. I show that the new index, ?, has the following properties: (i) classic measures of freedom of choice are a special case of the ? index in the context of individual choice; (ii) the Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik indices are special cases of the ? index in the context of binary voting games; (iii) in bargaining games, the ? index of a player combines his outside option and other parameters; (iv) the ? index allows a generalization of the Barry decomposition of success between power and luck to all unidimensional spatial games; (v) the ? power of a firm on its price is related to its Lerner index, but also to its technology and to the potential entry of competitors; (vi) in a simple competitive exchange setting, each agent has zero ? power on the equilibrium price but a ? power density can be defined, which, under some assumptions on preferences, is proportional to the agents’ wealth.

Du 09/06/2022 de 12:30 à 13:30

PSE- 48 boulevard Jourdan, 74014 Paris, salle R1-09

DOUSSET Léa (PSE)

*


brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Du 09/06/2022 de 12:30 à 13:30

PSE- 48 boulevard Jourdan, 74014 Paris, salle R1-09

TARTOVA Desislava (PSE)

Teacher value-added in the absence of annual test scores: utilising teacher networks





The literature that studies teacher effects on student outcomes has been restricted to a handful of countries because of the availability of annual standardised testing. The latter is important, as past grades are key to control for potential sorting between teachers and students based on ability. I propose an alternative method which exploits within-classroom across-subject variation and controls for sorting by exploiting networks of teachers - teachers from the same subject who are observed in classrooms with a unique link teacher from another subject. Using administrative data for the universe of middle schools in Metropolitan France, I find that for a 1 s.d. increase in the teacher value-added within school, student scores improve by 0.18 s.d. in Math and 0.16 s.d. in French. Consistent with the literature, I show that while teacher value-added estimates are positively associated with pedagogical grades, salaries and experience, no observable teacher characteristic explains a substantial part of the value-added estimates.

Behavior seminar

Du 09/06/2022 de 11:00 à 12:00

Salle R2.21, Campus Jourdan 75014 Paris

DESSI Roberta (Toulouse School of Economics )

Shame, Guilt, and Motivated Self-Confidence



écrit avec Junjie Ren (National University of Singapore) and Xiaojian Zhao (Monash University)




The available evidence from anthropology, economics, and psychology suggests that sensitivity to the emotions of shame and guilt varies across cultures. So does (over)confidence in ability and skills. Is there a connection between these observations? We address this question theoretically and empirically. We find significant evidence, consistent with our model, of a negative relationship between the cultural importance of shame relative to guilt and individual confidence. The relationship holds across countries, and for US immigrants relative to the culture of origin countries.

Macroeconomics Seminar

Du 09/06/2022 de 11:00 à 12:00

PSE- 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, salle R1-15

KURUSCU Burhan (University of Toronto)

Taxing Wealth and Capital Income when Returns are Heterogeneous



écrit avec Fatih Guvenen, Gueorgui Kambourov, and Sergio Ocampo Diaz




When is a wealth tax preferable to a capital income tax? We study this question theoretically in an infinite-horizon model with entrepreneurs and workers, in which entrepreneurial firms are subject to idiosyncratic productivity shocks and collateral constraints. There are two types of steady-state equilibria. The first one—which emerges under a wide set of plausible parameter values—is inefficient and exhibits capital misallocation and heterogeneous returns. The second one is efficient and exhibits homogeneous returns, but requires implausibly lax borrowing limits. In the heterogeneous returns equilibrium, replacing a capital income tax with a wealth tax increases steady-state aggregate productivity and output if (and only if) entrepreneurial productivity is positively auto-correlated. The gains result from the “use-it-or-lose-it” effect, which causes a reallocation of capital from entrepreneurs with low productivity to those with high productivity. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a switch to wealth taxes to imply higher average welfare, which amount to a lower bound on the capital-elasticity of output,?—around 1/3 for most parameter combinations. We then study the optimal mix when both tax instruments can be used jointly to maximize welfare. Optimal policy depends on two thresholds. When ? is sufficiently high, optimal policy involves a positive wealth taxand a negative capital income tax (a subsidy); the sign flips when ? is sufficiently low, and both taxes are positive between these two thresholds. Finally, we consider extensions that introduce a corporate sector, rent-seeking behavior, and endogenous entrepreneurial effort.



Texte intégral