Calendrier

Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
      01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Programme de la semaine


Liste des séminaires

Les séminaires mentionnés ici sont ouverts principalement aux chercheurs et doctorants et sont consacrés à des présentations de recherches récentes. Les enseignements, séminaires et groupes de travail spécialisés offerts dans le cadre des programmes de master sont décrits dans la rubrique formation.

Les séminaires d'économie

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Atelier Histoire Economique

Behavior seminar

Behavior Working Group

brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Development Economics Seminar

Economic History Seminar

Economics and Complexity Lunch Seminar

Economie industrielle

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Football et sciences sociales : les footballeurs entre institutions et marchés

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Industrial Organization

Job Market Seminar

Macro Retreat

Macro Workshop

Macroeconomics Seminar

NGOs, Development and Globalization

Paris Game Theory Seminar

Paris Migration Seminar

Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics

Paris Trade Seminar

PEPES (Paris Empirical Political Economics) Working Group

PhD Conferences

Propagation Mechanisms

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Regional and urban economics seminar

Régulation et Environnement

RISK Working Group

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Séminaire d'Economie et Psychologie

The Construction of Economic History Working Group

Theory Working Group

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Travail et économie publique externe

WIP (Work in progress) Working Group

Les séminaires de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Casse-croûte socio

Déviances et contrôle social : Approche interdisciplinaire des déviances et des institutions pénales

Dispositifs éducatifs, socialisation, inégalités

La discipline au travail. Qu’est-ce que le salariat ?

Méthodes quantitatives en sociologie

Modélisation et méthodes statistiques en sciences sociales

Objectiver la souffrance

Sciences sociales et immigration

Archives d'économie

Accumulation, régulation, croissance et crise

Commerce international appliqué

Conférences PSE

Economie du travail et inégalités

Economie industrielle

Economie monétaire internationale

Economie publique et protection sociale

Groupe de modélisation en macroéconomie

Groupe de travail : Economie du travail et inégalités

Groupe de travail : Macroeconomic Tea Break

Groupe de travail : Risques

Health Economics Working Group

Journée de la Fédération Paris-Jourdan

Lunch séminaire Droit et Economie

Marché du travail et inégalités

Risques et protection sociale

Séminaire de Recrutement de Professeur Assistant

Seminaire de recrutement sénior

SemINRAire

Archives de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Conférence du Centre de Théorie et d'Analyse du Droit

Espace social des inégalités contemporaines. La constitution de l'entre-soi

Etudes halbwachsiennes

Familles, patrimoines, mobilités

Frontières de l'anthropologie

L'auto-fabrication des sociétés : population, politiques sociales, santé

La Guerre des Sciences Sociales

Population et histoire politique au XXe siècle

Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire du politique

Pratiques quantitatives de la sociologie

Repenser la solidarité au 21e siècle

Séminaire de l'équipe ETT du CMH

Séminaire ethnographie urbaine

Sociologie économique

Terrains et religion


Calendrier du 12 septembre 2022

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Du 12/09/2022 de 17:00 à 18:15

Salle R1-09, Campus Jourdan, 75014 Paris

KAMENICA Emir (Chicago Booth, School of Business)

*Comparisons of Signals (joint with Ben Brooks and Alex Frankel)





A (Blackwell) experiment specifies the joint distribution of truth and the data generated by the experiment. A signal specifies the joint distribution of truth, the data generated by the signal, and the data generated by any other signal. Defining two experiments does not determine their joint informational content; defining two signals does. Blackwell (1953) studied (equivalent) comparisons of experiments; he characterized when one experiment is more valuable than another regardless of the preferences of the decision maker. We study (various, non-equivalent) comparisons of signals; among other comparisons, we characterize when one signal is more valuable than another regardless of the preferences of the decision maker and regardless of what other information the decision maker may have.

Econometrics Seminar

Du 12/09/2022 de 16:00 à 17:15

SEMENOVA Vira (Berkeley)

Automated Inference on Sharp Bounds





Many causal parameters involving the joint distribution of potential outcomes in treated and control states cannot be point-identified, but only be bounded from above and below. The bounds can be further tightened by conditioning on pre-treatment covariates, and the sharp version of the bounds corresponds to using a full covariate vector. This paper gives a method for estimation and inference on sharp bounds determined by a linear system of under-identified equalities (e.g., as in Heckman et al (ReSTUD, 1997)). In the sharp bounds’ case, the RHS of this system involves a nuisance function of (many) covariates (e.g., the conditional probability of employment in treated or control state). Combining Neyman-orthogonality and sample splitting, I provide an asymptotically Gaussian estimator of sharp bound that does not require solving the linear system in closed form. I demonstrate the method in an empirical application to Connecticut’s Jobs First welfare reform experiment.

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Du 12/09/2022 de 13:00 à 14:00

Maison des Sciences Economiques, Salle 116

FERNANDO Martin Espejo (KU Leuven)

Economic Sanctions as a Trade Policy Instrument? The 2014 Western-Russian Sanction Dispute





This article examines the impact on the Russian counter-sanctions (i.e., the agri-food product ban) introduced in Russia in August 2014 on the Russian imports and the Russian domestic market. On the one hand, by using the gravity model of international trade, this article quantifies the partial change in trade flows between Russia and its main trading partners in the short- and medium-term. Additionally, by performing a product- and country-level analysis, the article explores how the trade structure of Russia changes after the sanction dispute. On the other hand, a preliminary analysis on the Russian domestic market, and in particular, on the performance of the Russian agri-food sector is presented. Finally, some hypotheses about the use of the agri-food ban as a protectionist tool in response to the Russian accession to the WTO are explored.



Texte intégral

Régulation et Environnement

Du 12/09/2022 de 12:00 à 13:15

Salle R1-09, Campus Jourdan, 75014 Paris

CHERITEL Côme (PSE)

Generational Carbon Accounts: decomposing the carbon footprint by age to assess the impact of age and generation on carbon emissions





There is no broad scientific consensus on the impact of population dynamics such as population ageing on greenhouse gas emissions and consequently on global warming. Given that the analysis of the links between population and emissions is mainly carried out in an aggregated way, it is not possible to identify demographic heterogeneity in emissions patterns. While the studies using micro-data are able to disaggregate consumption by demographic characteristics, they often do not perform an analysis based on a true accounting of greenhouse gas emissions. This paper proposes a methodology for constructing age-specific carbon accounts, i.e. a decomposition of the carbon footprint by age. First, by estimating a household consumption model, I decompose a household's consumption by types of goods and by household members. Successively with an Input-Output analysis, I estimate the carbon footprint of each category of goods and services by age group and subsequently derive a decomposition of the carbon footprint of a given country by type of goods. The method proposed is highly flexible and can therefore be applied to any countries with micro data on household consumption. Here I present preliminary results for France, Japan, South Korea and Mexico between 1995 and 2018. According to the initial results, for all survey years, the consumption of high footprint goods is concentrated among those aged between 30–60-year-olds. The decomposition of consumption shows low emissions attributable to the youngest age group due to the scale effect that occurs when a household increases in size. Those aged over 60 years old have a lower volume of transport-related emissions, and hence a smaller carbon footprint. These results differ slightly by country, although they are broadly similar. While it is tempting to assume from these results that population ageing may facilitate decarbonisation due to lower consumption amongst the older age groups, the results presented here are static and do not take into account the dynamic nature of the issue. In the next steps, this study plans to analyse the carbon footprint by age, distinguishing between life cycle effects, cohort effects and technological dynamics.