Calendrier

Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
    01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28          

Programme de la semaine


Liste des séminaires

Les séminaires mentionnés ici sont ouverts principalement aux chercheurs et doctorants et sont consacrés à des présentations de recherches récentes. Les enseignements, séminaires et groupes de travail spécialisés offerts dans le cadre des programmes de master sont décrits dans la rubrique formation.

Les séminaires d'économie

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Atelier Histoire Economique

Behavior seminar

Behavior Working Group

brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Development Economics Seminar

Economic History Seminar

Economics and Complexity Lunch Seminar

Economie industrielle

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Football et sciences sociales : les footballeurs entre institutions et marchés

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Industrial Organization

Job Market Seminar

Macro Retreat

Macro Workshop

Macroeconomics Seminar

NGOs, Development and Globalization

Paris Game Theory Seminar

Paris Migration Seminar

Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics

Paris Trade Seminar

PEPES (Paris Empirical Political Economics) Working Group

PhD Conferences

Propagation Mechanisms

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Regional and urban economics seminar

Régulation et Environnement

RISK Working Group

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Séminaire d'Economie et Psychologie

The Construction of Economic History Working Group

Theory Working Group

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Travail et économie publique externe

WIP (Work in progress) Working Group

Les séminaires de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Casse-croûte socio

Déviances et contrôle social : Approche interdisciplinaire des déviances et des institutions pénales

Dispositifs éducatifs, socialisation, inégalités

La discipline au travail. Qu’est-ce que le salariat ?

Méthodes quantitatives en sociologie

Modélisation et méthodes statistiques en sciences sociales

Objectiver la souffrance

Sciences sociales et immigration

Archives d'économie

Accumulation, régulation, croissance et crise

Commerce international appliqué

Conférences PSE

Economie du travail et inégalités

Economie industrielle

Economie monétaire internationale

Economie publique et protection sociale

Groupe de modélisation en macroéconomie

Groupe de travail : Economie du travail et inégalités

Groupe de travail : Macroeconomic Tea Break

Groupe de travail : Risques

Health Economics Working Group

Journée de la Fédération Paris-Jourdan

Lunch séminaire Droit et Economie

Marché du travail et inégalités

Risques et protection sociale

Séminaire de Recrutement de Professeur Assistant

Seminaire de recrutement sénior

SemINRAire

Archives de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Conférence du Centre de Théorie et d'Analyse du Droit

Espace social des inégalités contemporaines. La constitution de l'entre-soi

Etudes halbwachsiennes

Familles, patrimoines, mobilités

Frontières de l'anthropologie

L'auto-fabrication des sociétés : population, politiques sociales, santé

La Guerre des Sciences Sociales

Population et histoire politique au XXe siècle

Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire du politique

Pratiques quantitatives de la sociologie

Repenser la solidarité au 21e siècle

Séminaire de l'équipe ETT du CMH

Séminaire ethnographie urbaine

Sociologie économique

Terrains et religion


Calendrier du 14 février 2023

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Du 14/02/2023 de 17:00 à 18:00

R1-13

ANDRé Loris (PSE)

Measuring the impact of the Amazon Fund on deforestation reduction in Brazil


Paris Trade Seminar

Du 14/02/2023 de 14:30 à 16:00

PSE, 48 boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, salle R2-01

ZAGO Angelo (U. Verona)

Quality, Collective Reputation and International Trade in Wines



écrit avec P. Bontems, D. Lubian




We introduce a model of heterogenous firms with endogenous product quality and collective reputation and develop an empirical strategy to test the models’ predictions. We find that our model better matches the data at hand, based on wine production and export data at firm level. In Melitz (Ecmtca, 2003), most productive firms can serve foreign markets. If quality is endogenous, however, things may differ. We extend this literature with a model in which quality is endogenous and considering collective reputation, as is the case of many manufacturing sectors of developed countries, e.g., Swiss Made watches, German cars, French wine, etc. Crozet et al. (RES, 2012) propose a quality-sorting version of Melitz (2003) and test it with firm level data. They propose (probably) the first empirical attempt to test the quality interpretation of Melitz (2003), combining firm-level data that directly measures quality (from Juhlin, a Champagne Wines guidebook) and trade (from export data) for Champagne makers. Building on Melitz & Ottaviano (RES, 2008) and Antoniades (JIE, 2015), we start from a monopolistic competition model, in which firms are heterogenous in innate quality. In addition, firms can improve quality by exerting quality development effort; moreover, production exhibits constant returns to scale, with marginal cost increasing in innate quality and final quality. On the other hand, demand is influenced by perceived quality, expressed as a weighted average of true firm quality (individual reputation) and average quality in the market, i.e., “collective reputation”, in the sense of Fleckinger (wp, 2007). In the theoretical analysis we show, among other things, that the exported quality and the range of exporting firms depend on the degree of expertise of the destination market’s consumers, that is their ability to distinguish individual vs. collective reputations. Using micro-data at the firm’s level, we test whether quality, collective reputation (CR) and consumer expertise in the destination countries have an effect on the extensive and intensive margins of trade. We construct a set of quality indicators based on the major wine guides associated to firms. We use data on wine firms located in the Verona province, an interesting setting per se, since it has both red and white wines. In addition, for red wines in particular, it has experienced a significant increase in worldwide reputation (especially for Amarone wines) and demand. To obtain a proxy of consumer expertise in each destination market, we use Google searches in different countries by retrieving data from Google Trends. Therefore, we estimate an otherwise ‘standard’ gravity equation where - among other explanatory variables such as distance, GDP, population, etc. - we have proxies for collective reputation, quality and the degree of consumers’ expertise in the destination markets. Using cross-sectional data, we find that quality, collective reputation and consumer expertise are indeed important in making exporting more likely (extensive margins), in exporting different products, and (to some extent) also in exporting more (intensive margins). Overall, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that the degree of expertise in destination markets do not have an effect on the firms that export and the product they do export. This seems to suggest that the endogenous quality model we propose better fits the data at hand.

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Du 14/02/2023 de 12:30 à 13:30

Salle R2.21, Campus Jourdan

BASELGIA Enea ( University of St. Gallen)

Behavioral Responses to Special Tax Regimes for the Super-Rich: Insights from Swiss Rich Lists



écrit avec Isabel Z. Martínez (ETH Zurich)




We collect, digitize, and supplement Swiss rich lists published in the “BILANZ” business magazine since 1989, to gain new insights on the structure and dynamics of top wealth in Switzerland. We show that 60% of the super-rich are heirs—a fraction twice as large than in the US, where many super-rich are self-made—and that half of the super-rich residing in Switzerland are foreign-born. Based on this new dataset, we estimate the sensitivity of the location choice of super-rich foreigners to a preferential tax scheme, under which wealthy foreigners are taxed on their expenses, rather than their true income and wealth. We are the first to evaluate this infamous policy (which bears similarities with “non-dom” taxation in the UK or Italy), and show that when some Swiss cantons abolished this practice, their stock of super-rich foreigners dropped by 30% as a consequence. We find no response for the unaffected Swiss super-rich.