Calendrier

Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
    01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Programme de la semaine


Liste des séminaires

Les séminaires mentionnés ici sont ouverts principalement aux chercheurs et doctorants et sont consacrés à des présentations de recherches récentes. Les enseignements, séminaires et groupes de travail spécialisés offerts dans le cadre des programmes de master sont décrits dans la rubrique formation.

Les séminaires d'économie

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Atelier Histoire Economique

Behavior seminar

Behavior Working Group

brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Development Economics Seminar

Economic History Seminar

Economics and Complexity Lunch Seminar

Economie industrielle

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Football et sciences sociales : les footballeurs entre institutions et marchés

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Industrial Organization

Job Market Seminar

Macro Retreat

Macro Workshop

Macroeconomics Seminar

NGOs, Development and Globalization

Paris Game Theory Seminar

Paris Migration Seminar

Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics

Paris Trade Seminar

PEPES (Paris Empirical Political Economics) Working Group

PhD Conferences

Propagation Mechanisms

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Regional and urban economics seminar

Régulation et Environnement

RISK Working Group

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Séminaire d'Economie et Psychologie

The Construction of Economic History Working Group

Theory Working Group

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Travail et économie publique externe

WIP (Work in progress) Working Group

Les séminaires de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Casse-croûte socio

Déviances et contrôle social : Approche interdisciplinaire des déviances et des institutions pénales

Dispositifs éducatifs, socialisation, inégalités

La discipline au travail. Qu’est-ce que le salariat ?

Méthodes quantitatives en sociologie

Modélisation et méthodes statistiques en sciences sociales

Objectiver la souffrance

Sciences sociales et immigration

Archives d'économie

Accumulation, régulation, croissance et crise

Commerce international appliqué

Conférences PSE

Economie du travail et inégalités

Economie industrielle

Economie monétaire internationale

Economie publique et protection sociale

Groupe de modélisation en macroéconomie

Groupe de travail : Economie du travail et inégalités

Groupe de travail : Macroeconomic Tea Break

Groupe de travail : Risques

Health Economics Working Group

Journée de la Fédération Paris-Jourdan

Lunch séminaire Droit et Economie

Marché du travail et inégalités

Risques et protection sociale

Séminaire de Recrutement de Professeur Assistant

Seminaire de recrutement sénior

SemINRAire

Archives de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Conférence du Centre de Théorie et d'Analyse du Droit

Espace social des inégalités contemporaines. La constitution de l'entre-soi

Etudes halbwachsiennes

Familles, patrimoines, mobilités

Frontières de l'anthropologie

L'auto-fabrication des sociétés : population, politiques sociales, santé

La Guerre des Sciences Sociales

Population et histoire politique au XXe siècle

Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire du politique

Pratiques quantitatives de la sociologie

Repenser la solidarité au 21e siècle

Séminaire de l'équipe ETT du CMH

Séminaire ethnographie urbaine

Sociologie économique

Terrains et religion


Calendrier du 23 avril 2020

Macroeconomics Seminar

Du 23/04/2020 de 15:45 à 17:00

PSE - using ZOOM

BRAUN Thomas (Columbia)

Revisiting Unemployment with an Intensive Margin - Using ZOOM





The unemployment rate is the most used single indicator of labor market conditions, but its measure is black and white, lacking any notion of intensity. This paper introduces a continuous unemployment rate; a measure in which people are weighted by their relative search effort. The measure of relative search effort is a monthly probability of exerting search effort, estimated from the American Time Use Survey. The paper delivers a continuous unemployment rate, as well as adjusted labor market flows, for the United States from 1980 onward. On average, the continuous unemployment rate is 4.8 percentage points higher than the standard unemployment rate and recovers slower after every recession since 1990. While the standard unemployment rate has a downward trend over time, the continuous unemployment rate does not, suggesting no decrease in the natural rate of unemployment. Further, the continuous unemployment rate accounts for more of the variation in nominal wages than standard unemployment rate or unemployment gap.

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Du 23/04/2020 de 12:30 à 13:30

salle R2-20, campus Jourdan - 75014 Paris

MUN Soffia (PSE)

ANNULE


Behavior seminar

Du 23/04/2020 de 11:00 à 12:00

Online

PRATI Alberto (University College London)

ZOOM. Time preferences for duration



écrit avec Maria Bigoni, Stéphane Luchini




Economic models typically assume agents to positively discount their future utility, that is, to enjoy sooner benefits more than later ones. A growing empirical literature has documented systematic violations of positive discounting for some non-monetary items. Yet, the reason for such violations is unclear. A key role might be played by the degree of temporal fungibility, intended as the extent to which a good can or cannot be saved for a later period. Herein, we report a longitudinal laboratory experiment where we study time preferences for a good with high market fungibility but no temporal fungibility: time spent in the laboratory. Subjects are asked to allocate money (control) and free time (treatment) over two future periods. We design a novel allocation environment which allows to disentangle discounting and convexity properties of the utility function. We find that, ceteris paribus, people prefer to allocate more money to the sooner than the later period, but more free time to the later than the sooner period. Personal timetables and heterogeneous preferences cannot solely explain this asymmetry. Our results suggest that positive discounting can lead to non-negligible predictive errors in many relevant domains, such as health, education and labor. They also invite to reconsider the interpretation of the discount factor in monetary decisions.

Travail et économie publique externe

Du 23/04/2020 de 11:00 à 12:00

PSE- Using ZOOM

BRYSON Alex (University College London)

Are Women Doing It For Themselves? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap



écrit avec Nikolaos Theodoropoulos (University of Cyprus) and John Forth (City University of London).




Using matched employer-employee data for Britain from the 2004 and 2011 Workplace Employment Relations Surveys (WERS), we find a raw gender wage gap in hourly wages of around 0.18-0.21 log points. The regression-adjusted gap is around half that. However, the gender wage gap declines substantially with an increasing share of female managers in the workplace. The gap is no longer statistically significant when around 90 percent of workplace managers are women, a scenario that obtains in around one in ten workplaces. The gap closes because women's wages rise with the share of female managers in the workplace while men's wages fall. Instrumental variables estimates suggest the share of female managers in the workplace has a causal impact in reducing the gender wage gap. The role of female managers in closing the gender wage gap is more pronounced when employees are paid for performance, consistent with the proposition that women are more likely to be paid equitably when managers have discretion in the way they reward performance and those managers are women. These findings suggest a stronger presence of women in managerial positions can help tackle the gender wage gap.



Texte intégral