Calendrier

Lu Ma Me Je Ve Sa Di
            01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Programme de la semaine


Liste des séminaires

Les séminaires mentionnés ici sont ouverts principalement aux chercheurs et doctorants et sont consacrés à des présentations de recherches récentes. Les enseignements, séminaires et groupes de travail spécialisés offerts dans le cadre des programmes de master sont décrits dans la rubrique formation.

Les séminaires d'économie

Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Atelier Histoire Economique

Behavior seminar

Behavior Working Group

brown bag Travail et Économie Publique

Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Development Economics Seminar

Economic History Seminar

Economics and Complexity Lunch Seminar

Economie industrielle

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Football et sciences sociales : les footballeurs entre institutions et marchés

GSIELM (Graduate Students International Economics and Labor Market) Lunch Seminar

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Industrial Organization

Job Market Seminar

Macro Retreat

Macro Workshop

Macroeconomics Seminar

NGOs, Development and Globalization

Paris Game Theory Seminar

Paris Migration Seminar

Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics

Paris Trade Seminar

PEPES (Paris Empirical Political Economics) Working Group

PhD Conferences

Propagation Mechanisms

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Regional and urban economics seminar

Régulation et Environnement

RISK Working Group

Roy Seminar (ADRES)

Séminaire d'Economie et Psychologie

The Construction of Economic History Working Group

Theory Working Group

TOM (Théorie, Organisation et Marchés) Lunch Seminar

Travail et économie publique externe

WIP (Work in progress) Working Group

Les séminaires de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Casse-croûte socio

Déviances et contrôle social : Approche interdisciplinaire des déviances et des institutions pénales

Dispositifs éducatifs, socialisation, inégalités

La discipline au travail. Qu’est-ce que le salariat ?

Méthodes quantitatives en sociologie

Modélisation et méthodes statistiques en sciences sociales

Objectiver la souffrance

Sciences sociales et immigration

Archives d'économie

Accumulation, régulation, croissance et crise

Commerce international appliqué

Conférences PSE

Economie du travail et inégalités

Economie industrielle

Economie monétaire internationale

Economie publique et protection sociale

Groupe de modélisation en macroéconomie

Groupe de travail : Economie du travail et inégalités

Groupe de travail : Macroeconomic Tea Break

Groupe de travail : Risques

Health Economics Working Group

Journée de la Fédération Paris-Jourdan

Lunch séminaire Droit et Economie

Marché du travail et inégalités

Risques et protection sociale

Séminaire de Recrutement de Professeur Assistant

Seminaire de recrutement sénior

SemINRAire

Archives de sociologie, anthropologie, histoire et pluridisciplinaires

Conférence du Centre de Théorie et d'Analyse du Droit

Espace social des inégalités contemporaines. La constitution de l'entre-soi

Etudes halbwachsiennes

Familles, patrimoines, mobilités

Frontières de l'anthropologie

L'auto-fabrication des sociétés : population, politiques sociales, santé

La Guerre des Sciences Sociales

Population et histoire politique au XXe siècle

Pratiques et méthodes de la socio-histoire du politique

Pratiques quantitatives de la sociologie

Repenser la solidarité au 21e siècle

Séminaire de l'équipe ETT du CMH

Séminaire ethnographie urbaine

Sociologie économique

Terrains et religion


Calendrier du mois de septembre 2024

Programme de la semaine précédente Programme de la semaine Programme de la semaine suivante
(du 2024-01-29 au 2024-02-05)(du 2024-02-05 au 2024-02-11)(du 2024-02-11 au 2024-02-18)

Semaine du 2024-02-05 au 2024-02-11


Casual Friday Development Seminar - Brown Bag Seminar

Du 09/02/2024 de 13:00 à 14:00

R1-09

GANTIER MITA Marcelo (PSE)

Missing an important part of the picture? Measurement in Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic Systems


EU Tax Observatory Seminar

Du 09/02/2024 de 12:00 à 13:00

Salle R1-14

CZAJKA Léo (UCLouvain)

(JOB TALK) Fraud Detection Under Limited State Capacity: Experimental Evidence From Senegal



écrit avec with Bassirou Sarr and Mattea Stein




Tax administrations in low-income countries face widespread tax evasion and high enforcement costs. They thus need information to detect where tax evasion is most severe, and allocate scarce resources accordingly. This paper shows that leveraging large firms’ trading network to collect information about their suppliers is a cost-efficient way to detect tax evasion and increase future audit returns. We collaborate with the Senegalese tax administration on a vast data collection effort to digitise lists of payments submitted by the largest firms and show that 88.6% of these firms provide incomplete information about their suppliers. This prevents any cross-checking against income declared by the suppliers themselves. We then randomise a low-cost communication campaign across all 3,487 misreporting firms, to discourage future misreporting. The intervention increases the prevalence of suppliers’ identification information by 52%. In aggregate, this allows to uncover $145.5 million in unreported revenue (i.e. 0.5 % of GDP). Most of it accrues to a few tax-registered suppliers, as opposed to informal ones. A simulation exercise shows that exploiting the newly available information to target the largest under-reporting suppliers would increase audit returns by at least 100%.



Texte intégral

EPCI (Economie politique du changement institutionnel) Seminar

Du 09/02/2024 de 11:00 à 12:30

MSE, salle 116

GRITTERSOVA Jana (PSE)

The Great Recession and the Bank of England's Monetary Policy: The Political Ramifications of Ultra-Low Interest Rates





How and why do politicians' monetary policy preferences differ from that of autonomous central banks? When and why do politicians support and criticize central banks? This paper examines the extent to which the weights on inflation and employment in the preferred monetary policy reaction functions differ between the Bank of England and British politicians in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. I construct a novel database containing politicians' statements about the Bank of England's monetary policy from 2007 to 2017. These are statements extracted from newspaper articles and newswire reports regarding the Bank of England's monetary policy (interest rates and quantitative easing) made by government officials (prime minister and all ministers and Members of Parliament). The paper yields two main findings. First, in contrast to the existing literature, I find that British politicians give more importance to price stability (i.e., call for higher interest rates) and place a lower weight on unemployment in times of crisis. This result may seem less surprising in light of the political and distributional consequences of unconventional monetary policies implemented by central banks as emergency measures after the 2008 global financial crash. Asset price appreciation and rising wealth inequality amid wage stagnation, partly from unorthodox monetary policies of ultra-low interest rates, fueled public discontent and the populist surge across democratic societies. Right-wing populist leaders, drawing on public skepticism toward experts, technocrats, and elites, have emerged as the most outspoken critics of central banks. I argue that established political parties facing dissatisfied voters experiencing economic hardship also shifted their attention from traditional left-right issues to the distributional consequences of exceptional monetary policies as a self-preservation strategy. Second, I also find that the relative weight of inflation performance in politicians' preferred reaction functions decreases in favor of lower interest rates when their re-election chances are high, when a left party is in power, when the public trust in the BoE is low, and when the British pound appreciates.

Histoire des entreprises et de la finance

Du 07/02/2024 de 16:00 à 17:30

R2.20

FABRE Antoine () Labardin P., Loizeau J., Fabre A., Boyer C. (2022), La fabrique managériale de l’Anthropocène, Le rôle du prix de revient des plantations d’hévéa dans la déforestation en Indochine au début du XXe siècle, Conférence « Anthropocene et management, Repe;

La séance est annulée

Economic History Seminar

Du 07/02/2024 de 12:00 à 13:30

R1.09

CAGE Julia(Sciences Po)
PIKETTY Thomas(EHESS-PSE)

Une histoire du conflit politique. Elections et inégalités sociales en France, 1789-2022, Seuil 2023



écrit avec http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/CagePiketty2023Extraits.pdf




Site internet du livre et base de données: https://www.unehistoireduconflitpolitique.fr/



Texte intégral

PSI-PSE (Petit Séminaire Informel de la Paris School of Economics) Seminar

Du 06/02/2024 de 17:00 à 18:00

HONG Sehyun ()

Income Inequality in South Korea, 1982-2020: Evidence from the Distributional National Account


Applied Economics Lunch Seminar

Du 06/02/2024 de 12:30 à 13:30

Salle R2.21

LOGEART Rosanne ()

Does Access Mean Success? Connection to Policy-Makers and Lobbying Success of Political Actors





This article aims at understanding the policy-making process by examining the relationship between access to policy-makers and lobbying success. I collect unique data on the textual content of lobbying activities and their subsequent policy changes, allowing the identification of lobbying success in 129,153 comments across 482 regulations. I match this novel data with meetings held between policy-makers and interest representatives to measure access to policy-makers. It reveals notable disparities in access, with the business sector having more access to policy-makers compared to civil society. Moreover, I find that access to policy-makers is associated with higher likelihoods of lobbying success. This result holds true when considering entities with access to policy-makers solely before the discussion of a regulation they want to influence, suggesting that reputation and connection building play a critical role. I also find that entities with more access, characterized by numerous meetings with policy-makers, are the most likely to shape policy changes. Lastly, interacting access and actor type shows that companies and business associations drive these results, experiencing higher success rates with access. In contrast, other entities do not enjoy an increased probability of success from access to policy-makers.

GPET Seminar

Du 06/02/2024 de 10:30 à 12:30

R5-10




• 10h00-10h45: Valentina Gabriella • 10:45-11:30: Nada Hazem • 11:30-12:15: Balasai Vanukuri • Followed by Lunch séminaire d’économie appliquée : 12.30-13.30 • Rosanne Logeart